by chetangole on 6/17/17, 2:40 AM with 340 comments
by Animats on 6/17/17, 6:00 AM
The inputs seem to be road line recognition, optical flow for the road, and solid object recognition, all vision-driven. Object recognition is limited. It doesn't recognize traffic cones as obstacles, either on the road centerline or on the road edge. Nor does it seem to be aware of guard rails or bridge railings just outside the road edge. It probably can't drive around an obstacle; we never see it do that in the video.
This looks like lane following plus smart cruise control plus GPS-based route guidance. That's nice, but it's not good enough that you can go to sleep while it's driving.
by adanto6840 on 6/17/17, 4:28 AM
"Please note also that using a self-driving Tesla for car sharing and ride hailing for friends and family is fine, but doing so for revenue purposes will only be permissible on the Tesla Network, details of which will be released next year."
by billhathaway on 6/17/17, 4:31 AM
Autopilot Updates We just released the latest version of Autopilot. You can now experience Enhanced Autopilot features including Traffic-Aware Cruise Control, Autosteer, Auto Lane Change, Parallel + Perpendicular Autopark, and Summon. Automatic Emergency Braking, Forward + Side Collision Warning, and more advanced safety features are also active and standard.
All Tesla vehicles have the hardware needed for full self-driving capability at a safety level substantially greater than that of a human driver. And Tesla vehicles continue to improve with over-the-air software updates, introducing new features and improving existing functionality to make your vehicle safer and more capable over time.
by ilaksh on 6/17/17, 4:31 AM
My theory is still that the demo video is actually from Nvidia's SDK and the actual autopilot they deployed is totally different and not actually in the 'self-driving' category at all at this point.
But they are very aggressively rolling out updates and new features for more autonomy and yes they do intend to push for a complete door-to-door self-drive ASAP, ideally before the end of 2017 (at least as a new alpha version they can demo). Otherwise they would not sell it as such. But they do not plan to take another year to get there, based on Musk's tweets and the fact so many already paid extra for a full self-driving ability.
by pilif on 6/17/17, 3:48 AM
by manav on 6/17/17, 6:25 AM
There a few new features that my AP1 might not have like Perpendicular Autopark, but I won't know till I get it back. From what it seems it's just gotten to the level that they were with with the previous generation that was developed by or in conjunction with MobilEye.
I think they will need a hardware revision for actual full self driving perhaps 2 years away.
by EngineerBetter on 6/17/17, 5:17 AM
This is a statement of intent, and production vehicles are a long way from having software that enables this.
by jonah on 6/17/17, 6:00 AM
by madengr on 6/17/17, 5:18 AM
by rvalue on 6/17/17, 5:54 AM
The amount of objects for detecting and avoiding will be way too high.
The tests shows almost clear conditions for driving. This should be tested on streets of NY or a busy city like Mumbai
by jshap70 on 6/17/17, 4:12 AM
by YeGoblynQueenne on 6/17/17, 10:30 AM
I think one big selling point of cars has always been that they grant the user a great amount of autonomy (unprecedented, in their time, taken for granted nowadays). You can ride your car and go anywhere you like! The cost of that autonomy of course is that some of us will be killed or maimed in road accidents, because you can't give silly little monkeys autonomy behind the controls of big powerful machines without death and carnage ensuing.
Self-driving cars propose to reduce this risk of death and injury by taking away the autonomy we traded it for in the first place. What remains would be just a mindless automatic system carting the user to and fro. Well, in that case- we don't need to wait around for full level-5 autonomy. We already have dumb machines that can do that: trains, trams, all sorts of vehicles-on-rails.
Why do we need self-driving cars, then?
Answer: we don't. And I haven't for a moment believed that any of this is anything to do with road safety. Note that nobody even discusses the other 900 pound gorilla in the room: pollution.
Guess what? Taking cars off roads completely would also reduce air and noise pollution tremendously.
by SigmundA on 6/17/17, 4:28 PM
by _up on 6/17/17, 10:26 AM
by redthrowaway on 6/17/17, 7:15 AM
by PinguTS on 6/17/17, 4:31 AM
That claim is strong and false. What about Roadster and the old Model S with the old AP1 hardware?
by bshimmin on 6/17/17, 6:35 AM
by make3 on 6/17/17, 5:40 PM
by arikr on 6/17/17, 4:05 AM
I wonder what the current status is, both in terms of software validation, and regulatory approval.
by BatFastard on 6/17/17, 3:54 PM
by Waterluvian on 6/17/17, 3:47 PM
by aerovistae on 6/17/17, 7:26 AM
by vosper on 6/17/17, 6:30 AM
by f0under on 6/17/17, 5:57 PM
by welpwelp on 6/17/17, 1:18 PM
by swah on 6/17/17, 4:23 PM
by aladine on 6/17/17, 1:25 PM
by theprop on 6/17/17, 4:07 AM
by stdcall83 on 6/17/17, 8:05 AM
by neofromfut on 6/17/17, 2:13 PM