by sama on 5/13/17, 4:29 PM with 51 comments
by tristanho on 5/14/17, 7:10 PM
You mention Outlook being "Gold", while IQ is lead. Outlook seems to be something we can improve, both on a collective level, and also on an individual level. You discuss a lot how to use this Outlook to invent the future, but how can we develop our Outlook at more of a meta-level? If we want to be the people capable of looking 50 years into the future and then bringing our insights back to the present, how can we develop this skill?
I suspect the answer has something to do with reading good books and learning from people who already have great outlooks.
by pilingual on 5/13/17, 4:58 PM
To me, I think the key is to balance the universal with the non-universal to forge progress.
One interesting connection is that in an earlier lecture Steve Huffman notes they tried categories with Reddit but reverted. Here Kay explains why.
Incidentally, someone who calls out UX issues like the absence of a map in the side entrance of the Gates building is my kind of person.
by nicklovescode on 5/15/17, 1:17 AM
by aryehof on 5/15/17, 12:00 PM
by asrp on 5/14/17, 8:57 PM
circle(x=time, y=-time*time, r=10)
so a render can get the information it needs but there aren't individual frames to edit.
In general, what happens to interoperability if different programs/projects represent the same things, like images and animations, very differently?
And how security could be handled in such a system? Either against a malicious or haywire programs/project?
by bsaul on 5/14/17, 8:33 PM
by alexkon on 5/13/17, 4:56 PM
by alishan-l on 5/16/17, 4:27 AM
What are some resources to learn more about the 90% of programming ideas created at PARC that did not come out? Which do you think hold the most potential for the future?
Thank you
by QuickOne on 5/14/17, 9:58 PM
by justin66 on 5/14/17, 11:07 PM
by gleb on 5/14/17, 10:53 PM
by da02 on 5/13/17, 10:28 PM
He reminded me of this anecdote: In an intro to Anthropology video on Stanford's YouTube channel. The professor passed out a questionnaire that included, "Why are you taking this class?". Someone wrote, "Yes". I expected that kind of response in my biz classes @ CUNY, but not @ Stanford. Especially, in an Anthropology class.