by zump on 2/10/17, 7:55 AM with 75 comments
by patio11 on 2/10/17, 8:09 AM
In terms of straight up W-2ing without taking entrepreneurial levels of risk, I think you're looking at either finance or (restricting 25% to ~10%) AppAmaGooBookSoft. Note that you're not aiming to have the engineering skills of Jeff Dean but rather looking to have the business impact of the guy who coded the credit card processing for AdWords. (An identifiable person who actually exists, or I would be more explicit about the returns to that example.)
There's also "Join a startup as a very early engineer" but you're primarily compensated for picking the winner there -- there's many great businesses in the ranks of e.g. YC companies but if you had joined as the first non-founding engineer the majority do not result in the outcome you're looking for.
I'll leave the obligatory disclaimer "What motivates this goal? There are probably more interesting goals if you consider your values carefully."
by gigatexal on 2/10/17, 8:13 AM
by nvarsj on 2/10/17, 8:40 AM
Making that kind of money as an engineer is much more of a crap shoot. Just be the best engineer you can and have big influence wherever you work. Then get very lucky and work on the right project at the right time at the right company.
On a more philosophical note - if you spend your life chasing money, odds are you're going to end up pretty unhappy. Try not to succumb to the capitalist rat race - I know it's hard, but it will make you happier :).
edit: Updated to be less hyperbolic. It's still tough to make a lot of money even going the trader route.
by risingintonatio on 2/10/17, 8:52 AM
There are compensation spreadsheets floating around and I've been privy to Facebook's and Google's. Assuming the numbers there are accurate (and anecdotally they are), even the "top 5%" engineers getting discretionary equity and bonus don't make more than $600k.
Meanwhile, executives easily make twice that in yearly cash bonuses.
I've grown a disdain towards said execs for being paid incommensurate with their actual value generated. Perhaps that's just my naïveté, and indeed they are that valuable. But I don't think so.
In short, to command astronomical salaries you need a pyramid of people working beneath you, so that you can garner part of their productivity for yourself.
Charisma will help you get there.
by lsiebert on 2/10/17, 8:11 AM
by dandelany on 2/10/17, 8:12 AM
Sidenote: the 75th percentile isn't making anywhere near $1M.
by adamnemecek on 2/10/17, 8:10 AM
by amorphic on 2/10/17, 9:32 AM
"Nobody ever got rich by earning wages."
by quasiuna on 2/10/17, 8:18 AM
In a nutshell, learn C++.
by myrandomcomment on 2/10/17, 8:38 AM
Top 25%? Yah no.
You best bet is a steady job at the big 4 with a good RSU plan.
by jankotek on 2/10/17, 8:27 AM
As a consultant you might be able to get to this salary. But you will be able to bill only a fraction of your time.
by _dax on 2/10/17, 2:29 PM
I know a few people between ages 40-50 that make this much working at a hedge fund as pure engineers. None of them are incredible, to be honest I could do their job and I'm half their age. They've just put in their time there, didn't get distracted by more interesting opportunities, and don't mind a typical office job with no perks.
by vostok on 2/10/17, 8:50 AM
I agree with Patrick that you are far more likely to achieve this through entrepreneurship than through working in technology (or finance for that matter).
by austinjp on 2/10/17, 8:32 AM
Why engineering? If money is so important to you there might be other industries better suited.
You sound Machiavellian, or that you may edge towards it. Be careful with that. Money is no good if it can't buy you what you want or need.
by yami on 2/10/17, 8:40 AM
by gadders on 2/10/17, 11:22 AM
by monodeldiablo on 2/10/17, 9:52 AM
Now, with that out of the way, I will say this: There's a pernicious myth in the industry that you need to be "brilliant" to create something valuable and successful. Which is bullshit. You just need to be competent, persistent, and extraordinarily lucky.
Here, in order, are the modern keys to wealth:
- Know rich people. Be someone they enjoy hanging out with. People want to work with people they like, so this greatly increases the odds they'll throw you a project or put you on their team. See: Balmer, Steve. (NOTE: This requires social skills.)
- Create a business product. Be a middle man. Build a product that identifies and ameliorates a common business pain point. Find a major, underlying cost that is industry-wide and create a service or app that reduces this cost for the user. As quickly as possible, put competent people to work under you. Scale quickly and gets lots of smart people in your corner quickly. (NOTE: This requires social skills, observational skills, persistence, technical skills, and a generous helping of luck.)
- Create a consumer product. Be a founder. Build a business that satisfies a base human desire (entertainment, sex, greed, etc.) and charge money for it. See above. (NOTE: This requires all the same skills as above, plus more luck. The consumer space is packed with competition.)
- Be indispensable in a lucrative, but unpopular, niche. Specialize in MUMPS or COBOL or FORTRAN. Pick an industry that many avoid, like porn or gambling or spam. There's less competition, sure, but there's also higher risk to your long-term employment. And you have to live with yourself, so be sure you're OK with your choice. (NOTE: This seems to be the most compatible with your skill set and attitude, but might not be an ethical/moral match.)
- Grind away in a decent job, save aggressively, and invest. Be boring. Get a $120k/yr job and live like a student, putting at least half your income into savings. After a few years, start investing that money in people more motivated/skilled than yourself. This has the highest likelihood of working out -- assuming economic stability -- but is the least sexy option available to moderately talented engineers because it takes a long time. (NOTE: You'll still probably need social skills to be successful at this.)
- Get profoundly lucky. Be in the right place at the right time. Be the founding engineer or a stupid startup at a time when VCs are throwing money at everything and asking no questions. Be an early hire at a unicorn. Stumble on the next Angry Birds or Pokemon Go or whatever. (NOTE: This is entirely beyond your control. Almost everybody in The Valley of Dreams is pursuing this goal. You're still better-served by having technical and social skills.)
by lscore720 on 2/12/17, 4:55 AM
by lutusp on 2/10/17, 8:39 AM
> I don't want to have to be in the top 1% like Jeff Dean, but top 25% and still get these results.
That's a contradiction in terms. If you made a million dollars, that outcome would place you in the top 1% among software engineers.
If the Efficient Market Hypothesis is valid and in operation in the software marketplace, then to make a million dollars, you will have to earn it. It's really as simple as that. Speaking as someone who made plenty more than a million dollars -- by earning it.
> Don't have social skills and want to make more money.
But people without social skills end up working for people who do have social skills. The latter collect the money, the former do the work.
by RichardHeart on 2/10/17, 8:09 AM
by ashurov on 2/10/17, 8:08 AM
by ryankennedyio on 2/10/17, 8:41 AM
by justincormack on 2/10/17, 8:38 AM
by xiphias on 2/10/17, 8:44 AM
by Tharkun on 2/10/17, 8:26 AM