by warsaw on 2/2/17, 7:53 AM with 129 comments
by toomanybeersies on 2/2/17, 9:34 AM
Every department and authority has their own law enforcement branch. You've got county sheriffs, state police, highway patrol, campus police, transport police etc. on a local authority level.
Then on a federal level, as the paper points out, everyone from the IRS to the Department of Education have their own law enforcement officers.
In the rest of the world, police is much more centralised.
Here in New Zealand (admittedly a small country), the Police are the only agency with general powers of arrest, and the only department outside the military with firearms.
The police don't have fancy equipment, if they need an APC, or helicopters or whatever (the police do have one), they'll borrow it from the Defence Force. It's not like they need to pay for and maintain their own stock to use once in a blue moon.
If an agency like the IRD (our tax department) need to raid or arrest someone, they'll get the police to do it.
I don't fully understand why the USA isn't like this. I understand why there's federal and local law enforcement, but if the FDA needs to raid and arrest people, why don't they second some FBI agents when they're needed?
by gerbal on 2/2/17, 9:13 AM
Many of these agencies maintain large facilities to serve their core purposes and have to provide security for their facilities.
Little in this report is anywhere as alarming as the reports authors would like to make it out to be. OpenTheBooks.com seems to take the view that all government spending is wasteful, and by describing it out of context seeks to present it as abuse. For instance they present research grants to Ivy League schools as government subsidy of those schools [1] and The US Government employing a lot of lawyers as somehow suspect [2].
[1] http://www.openthebooks.com/openthebooks_oversight_report_%E...
[2] http://www.openthebooks.com/openthebooks_snapshot_oversight_...
by tomohawk on 2/2/17, 9:50 AM
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posse_Comitatus_Act
The rampant expansion and use of SWAT is disgusting.
by joyeuse6701 on 2/2/17, 3:37 PM
by angry_octet on 2/2/17, 1:10 PM
There has been an increase, but most of it is essentially due to post 911 mindset that every facility needs armed guards. In other countries that would just be unarmed (possibly contracted) guards, who ring the police if there are any problems. But then, other countries have fewer guns. Also, the fragmentation of policing in the States almost requires having an agency force, because of jurisdiction and funding wars.
by yetihehe on 2/2/17, 8:54 AM
by devillius on 2/2/17, 5:00 PM
I fear that HN attributes all these to the current political atmosphere and how the foundation laid by the previous administration.
by jlarocco on 2/2/17, 9:24 AM
The Department of State, FBI, prison system, DEA, secret service, ICE, customs/border patrol, etc. are all on the top of the list, and I'd expect them to spend a lot of money on guns, ammo, and "military-style equipment".
A few of them are higher than I'd expect, but most of them seem reasonable. Any agency that uses armed security guards is going to spend some amount of money on guns, ammo, training, etc.
by vanattab on 2/2/17, 1:36 PM
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_law_enforcement_in_t...
by wallace_f on 2/2/17, 9:27 AM
by mcguire on 2/2/17, 5:51 PM
Likewise, did ICE switch from some other caliber to .40S&W?
by dandare on 2/2/17, 11:02 AM
by mcguire on 2/2/17, 5:40 PM
by yunolisten on 2/2/17, 1:19 PM
That's one way to 'retire' people. Take old Yeller out back...
by beedogs on 2/2/17, 1:44 PM
by kodfodrasz on 2/2/17, 8:12 AM
by huffmsa on 2/2/17, 12:15 PM
Citizens, pick up that rock.