by pearlsteinj on 1/23/17, 9:19 PM with 45 comments
by jcranmer on 1/23/17, 11:52 PM
One thing that is worth pointing out is that the chairs are all assigned seating to specific news organizations. This assignment is NOT done by the White House but the White House Correspondents' Association. So the Trump administration can't decide to, say, replace the Christian Science Monitor's or Al Jazeera's seat with Breitbart News.
The linked article doesn't discuss who is going to be allocating these virtual seats--and I rather suspect that it's going to be decided by the White House and not the White House Correspondents' Association. It's disappointing that the article doesn't mention this, since knowing the answer to this question is what really sets the purpose of the move. If it is to be given to the White House Correspondents' Association, then it is likely an attempt to give voice to a wider range of media... but if it's White House-controlled, then it's more likely an attempt to guide press briefings to only considering questions from more compliant news organizations.
Edit: There are 49 seats, not the 42 that I originally stated.
by taserian on 1/23/17, 10:55 PM
by jorblumesea on 1/23/17, 11:06 PM
by microDude on 1/23/17, 10:45 PM
by losvedir on 1/23/17, 10:49 PM
by droithomme on 1/23/17, 11:38 PM
by ionforce on 1/23/17, 10:58 PM