by yigit on 5/12/10, 9:09 PM with 30 comments
by rmorrison on 5/12/10, 9:57 PM
Ha, 20 accidents since 1971... It'd probably be more helpful to the general public for them to study which side of an ostrich it's safer to stand on.
by mjfern on 5/13/10, 3:03 AM
According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, over 37,000 people died in traffic crashes in the United States in 2008, which makes car accidents the 10th leading cause of death. To put this in perspective, this number of deaths is equivalent to 265 fully loaded Boeing 737 crashing, or one every business day of every year.
And how about non-fatal injuries from auto accidents? Over 2.5 million drivers and passengers (the same number of people living in the four states of Wyoming, Vermont, North Dakota, and Alaska) were injured in 2008. This makes traffic crashes the third leading cause of non-fatal injuries.
Of the injuries caused by traffic crashes, over 10% (or over 250,000) are incapacitating, in which the injury prevents the injured person from walking, driving, or normally continuing the activities the person was capable of performing before the injury occurred.
In sum, in a 10 year window about 1% of the total US population is either killed or seriously injured in a car accident.
by Bjoern on 5/12/10, 11:30 PM
[1] http://www.news.com.au/travel/travel-advice/how-to-survive-a...
by arch_hunter on 5/12/10, 11:15 PM
by joubert on 5/12/10, 10:11 PM
by mdh on 5/12/10, 11:23 PM
Is this saying that they only considered crashes where at least 1 person survived and at least 1 died? If so, doesn't this change the analysis from 'given you will be in a plane crash, how can you reduce your likelihood of dying?' to 'given that you will be in a plane crash and SOMEONE will survive, how can you increase the likelihood that it is you?'
I suspect the quotes at the beginning of the article are principally about the former question (and are probably correct in that context).
by westbywest on 5/12/10, 10:17 PM
Sure, I can believe that seats toward the rear of an aircraft tend to fair better in crashes. It's actually rather obvious, hence the decision to place the data recorders in the tail.
However, what use is this research to the vast majority of travelers who have limited choice in where they may sit on a flight? Doesn't this sort of research suggest telling such travelers, "well it sucks to be you, doesn't it?" And what about the airlines' need to fill as many seats as possible meet their bottom lines?
by metaguri on 5/13/10, 1:05 AM
by fjabre on 5/12/10, 11:48 PM
That can't be right.
by nowsourcing on 5/12/10, 10:16 PM