by lancer383 on 5/12/10, 12:57 PM with 45 comments
by raimondious on 5/12/10, 3:16 PM
The debate right now is one side saying you should use "HTML5" because it's more open than Flash while Flash is buggy, bloated, and proprietary. The other side is saying "I need Flash to give my clients what they want." Just like people started using CSS over table-based layouts when it was pragmatic, people will stop using Flash when Flash stops being the best tool for the job. There's nothing wrong with that.
by glhaynes on 5/12/10, 2:26 PM
by WiseWeasel on 5/12/10, 6:30 PM
The fact is, for video playback, it does just fine today, even on limited mobile devices, and if sites were to only replace Flash with HTML5 for video and audio playback, we're talking about 90% of Flash's popular use right there. As HTML5 matures, including content creation tools and the performance of various browser runtime implementations, it'll eat into Flash's share for other tasks as well. Apple is creating a market demand for HTML5 development tools and expertise, which is the first necessary step in order to bring the platform to maturity. After that happens, Flash developers will jump on board and forget this thing ever happened. Until then, just keep coding your crappy Flash ads and leave the rest of us who actually want some progress for the open web alone.
by emehrkay on 5/12/10, 4:28 PM
by tomlin on 5/12/10, 2:33 PM
by silentium on 5/12/10, 2:48 PM
by icefox on 5/12/10, 2:44 PM