by Learn2win on 12/23/16, 3:27 AM with 40 comments
by cocktailpeanuts on 12/23/16, 5:11 AM
Also the "Books" section is kind of misleading and made me think they're taking credit for something that they didn't do. After taking a look at the page for a while finally realized it's like scheme/lisp, and the books section kind of makes sense, but still it's still very confusing.
This may be too harsh but the design almost reminds me of those parking websites that make money off of adsense. Hope they put some more effort into the design so the website can actually do the language more justice.
by lomnakkus on 12/23/16, 7:50 AM
(It's also really annoying on mobile where you have to actively tap to show the links.)
EDIT: Reasoning: Does this page contain the information I need? I can't tell without apparently hovering over everything. (Plus, if I hover away from one of the 'graphs' it's easy to forget what was on there.)
by Blackthorn on 12/23/16, 7:11 AM
by joesb on 12/23/16, 11:10 AM
That basically sums up my problem learning Racket. "What is Racket the language? What language am I supposed to learn? What language am I supposed to use in production code? Will one language be compatible with another?
I got lost reading Racket document. One section talk about a class syntax of a language. Another talk about some other stuff that never utilize a class. What am I supposed to do with this?
I don't want to learn languages, I want to solve my problem.
by jstewartmobile on 12/23/16, 2:45 PM
Felleisen and and his group have been working on Racket for a long time, and it shows. I think PG's Arc even runs on top of it.
Only gripe I can register is that they have gone full-speed-ahead on the DSL/metaprogramming aspect which kind of works against the language. See Tarver's "The Bipolar Lisp Programmer," or Alan Kay's quote: "Lisp isn't a language, it's a building material."
by no_protocol on 12/23/16, 4:44 AM
From what I saw, it looks like a site that helps you make a variety of line drawings. Next time I need to make some line graphs, I'll check it out.
by aban on 12/23/16, 2:20 PM
IMHO it looks nice and modern, and quite readable thanks to the great typography, but there are some fair issues raised here. So I opened an issue to let them know about it [1].
by agumonkey on 12/23/16, 12:14 PM
by edem on 12/23/16, 10:42 AM
by um304 on 12/23/16, 9:26 AM
by Nekorosu on 12/23/16, 1:02 PM
The other issue is all the links lead to pages with really old design. Hope this will get fixed too eventually.
by adelarsq on 12/23/16, 2:14 PM
by auggierose on 12/23/16, 3:05 PM
https://redex.racket-lang.org/
I am trying to read the model part of the set of scopes paper and running it in PLT Redex, but it seems to be unavailable currently.
by largehotcoffee on 12/23/16, 6:19 AM
by gigatexal on 12/23/16, 6:33 AM