by r0h1n on 11/2/16, 8:50 AM with 50 comments
by iwillreply on 11/2/16, 11:03 AM
by herghost on 11/2/16, 10:17 AM
On the other hand, based on the examples given, it seems this is going to penalise people using language incorrectly - which I would assume can be strongly correlated with poor education. So on that basis, they're going to be saying that poor people are worse drivers and so must pay more? Is that ok?
But the biggest upshot of this whole thing is that suddenly there is a potential for real world financial consequences for what people write online. This is a game changer - and one I would imagine Facebook should be quite worried about.
I hope it triggers the start of a general awakening of the people when it comes to the impact of data overshare.
by bitJericho on 11/2/16, 10:12 AM
This is not a discount for courteous people. What this is is collection of personal data for advertising and data collection (to be resold) and a good way to advertise to people's friends.
And 350 a year? I'll believe it when I see it.
by faitswulff on 11/2/16, 1:43 PM
https://www.theguardian.com/money/2016/nov/02/facebook-admir...
> Facebook said protecting the privacy of its users was of the utmost importance to it and it had clear guidelines about how information obtained from the site should be used.
> Section 3.15 of Facebook’s platform policy states that the social media site’s data should not be used to “make decisions about eligibility, including whether to approve or reject an application or how much interest to charge on a loan”.
Well, that didn't last long.
by martin-adams on 11/2/16, 11:17 AM
While it's voluntary, it may be seen as ok. But what happens if you opt not to do anything on social media and you end up with a premium penalty, or worse, refusal to be insured. This happens today when applying for a mortgage. If you've never taken a loan and had no credit history, they have no data to score you against.
I would prefer a mechanism that analysed people's driving behaviour to assess risk, not what I like on Facebook.
by teekert on 11/2/16, 11:40 AM
Yeah right, that is not how insurance works. The cost per year for an insurance company is relatively stable and simply the chance a person crashes * the average cost of a crash * the amount of people insured. The other customers, without FB or who use a lot of exclamation marks will thus pay for a higher amount of the total costs. This gives them an incentive to go to a fair insurance company.
by newscracker on 11/2/16, 11:28 AM
by crottypeter on 11/2/16, 10:31 AM
also related: https://www.openrightsgroup.org/blog/2016/facebook-is-right-...
by untilHellbanned on 11/2/16, 10:03 AM
by MasterScrat on 11/2/16, 12:19 PM
Are there laws that require insurance pricing to be transparent?
by sickbeard on 11/2/16, 12:54 PM
by throwaway98237 on 11/2/16, 1:44 PM
by dazc on 11/2/16, 10:17 AM
by walshemj on 11/2/16, 11:56 AM
by fredley on 11/2/16, 9:36 AM