by niico on 10/21/16, 7:12 PM with 39 comments
by hbbio on 10/21/16, 7:51 PM
"These types of personalized PageRanks are virtually immune to manipulation by commercial interests. For a page to get a high PageRank, it must convince an important page, or a lot of non-important pages to link to it. At worst, you can have manipulation in the form of buying advertisements(links) on important sites. But, this seems well under control since it costs money"
by jzl on 10/22/16, 1:45 AM
Will expire in about a year and three months!
by gigatexal on 10/21/16, 7:51 PM
by andrewstuart2 on 10/21/16, 7:35 PM
And another paper by Page and Brin: http://infolab.stanford.edu/~backrub/google.html
by ucaetano on 10/21/16, 10:58 PM
by karakal on 10/21/16, 9:17 PM
by androidfox on 10/21/16, 7:29 PM
by ssn on 10/22/16, 11:07 AM
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/hits-on...
"The fact that in-degree features outperform PageRank under all measures is quite surprising. A possible explanation is that link-spammers have been targeting the published PageRank algorithm for many years, and that this has led to anomalies in the web graph that affect PageRank."
by jacquesm on 10/22/16, 8:41 AM
I believe that each and every technology that successfully manages to index the web in a new and useful way will further diminish the value of the web.
by Xeoncross on 10/22/16, 1:21 AM
I just googled for some implementations like this one in Go: https://github.com/dcadenas/pagerank
by teddyknox on 10/22/16, 2:24 AM