by hurrycane on 9/30/16, 5:38 PM with 36 comments
by imh on 10/1/16, 12:30 AM
>Today, we introduce Open Images, a dataset consisting of ~9 million URLs ... having a Creative Commons Attribution license* .
Then the footnote below:
>* While we tried to identify images that are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license, we make no representations or warranties regarding the license status of each image and you should verify the license for each image yourself.
I think this might be the most blatant instance I've ever seen of, "We have to write this even though it's essentially impossible for you to actually follow our directions."
by transcranial on 9/30/16, 8:17 PM
by diyseguy on 10/1/16, 12:49 AM
by devindotcom on 9/30/16, 8:05 PM
It's nice that they're doing this, helps advance the art I think. But it also puts a lot of smaller operations in unis sort of under the Google system in that they're best compared to Google's ML work and others using these datasets. It's a small way of stacking the deck to make Google and DeepMind more embedded in the community.
That said, its utility for others surely outweighs the strategic advantage gained here, so I for one welcome these libraries. A lot of work goes into them. Hopefully others will release theirs as well.
by zappo2938 on 10/1/16, 5:55 AM
by pilooch on 10/1/16, 6:53 PM
by dharma1 on 9/30/16, 10:58 PM
by rocky1138 on 9/30/16, 8:24 PM
by Omnipresent on 10/1/16, 1:01 AM