by franzpeterstein on 9/17/16, 5:30 PM with 50 comments
by Paul_S on 9/17/16, 10:32 PM
Anyway, any reasoning that divides distros between easy to use and hard to use is nonsense. Just because I'm used to Linux doesn't mean Ubuntu isn't the right distro for me. The questionnaire logic goes: well, you're capable of running this distro so you should run this distro.
Reality is if you're a developer you either use RHEL because that's what corporate chose or you use Ubuntu because that is the platform chosen by library devs and unless you use it as well you will waste time sorting out issues.
If you're a user then it doesn't matter what distro you use, they're all fine. If you want to play games then your best bet is Ubuntu.
by bunderbunder on 9/17/16, 8:27 PM
The explanations of what distinguishes each distribution are, to me, a wall of Linux jargon that is all familiar (Slackware was my primary OS for a while in the late '90s and early '00s), but also largely meaningless. From a user perspective, I'm interested in a tool like this precisely because I've got no idea whether I should prefer GNOME or Unity or KDE nowadays, and I don't really care to take the time to sift through the flamewars to find out. So when I'm dropped into the results and the top results are five different flavors of Ubuntu distinguished by what desktop environment they use, and the explanatory text for each largely boils down to, "Portmanteau-of-Ubuntu-and-$DesktopEnvironment is Ubuntu with $DesktopEnvironment", I'm left feeling like the tool has taken me on a short ride around the neighborhood and then dropped me off exactly where I started.
by blueside on 9/17/16, 8:13 PM
by k-mcgrady on 9/17/16, 9:03 PM
As for the site you could make the questions shorter/more easily readable. A radio button instead of a hyperlink would be much more intuitive for selection (and possibly auto-advancing to the next question once an option is selected).
by nmstoker on 9/17/16, 10:39 PM
Plenty of useful feedback from other users here. The one idea I'd develop from what one other said was improving the results page descriptions. You could actually use a couple of question responses to mildly tailor the descriptions - eg, a less experienced user could have text with a lower level of assumptions made and a more experienced user would get responses more relevant to where they were.
Finally, I'd have preferred to know it was a probabilistic recommendation up-front (as was initially concerned that I'd rule out choices with some responses)
by cuillevel3 on 9/17/16, 8:01 PM
by veddox on 9/17/16, 9:34 PM
1) The English translation feels a little bumpy (as compared to the German).
2) The presentation of the various distros should be a little more considerate of newbies (see bunderbunder's earlier comment).
3) A few questions need rethinking, especially the one on the target manager (see blueside's comment) and the one about the community.
Otherwise: great idea, concisely executed.
by fdomig on 9/17/16, 7:52 PM
by sebisebi on 9/17/16, 8:39 PM
by edcastro on 9/17/16, 6:41 PM
by seanwilson on 9/17/16, 8:52 PM
I'm good at fixing computer issues myself 1) Agree 2) Disagree
Also, if you move on to the next question automatically after an answer is given instead of having to press "next" the process would be a lot quicker.
by ramblenode on 9/17/16, 9:34 PM
by busterarm on 9/17/16, 8:24 PM
I just wish BSDs were an option here (I know, I know, not the goal here). I'm bullish on OpenBSD.
by mablap on 9/17/16, 11:10 PM
by olp2 on 9/18/16, 2:59 AM
pick: next button messes with the browser history.
by smkellat on 9/17/16, 8:33 PM
by steanne on 9/17/16, 7:54 PM
by ashitlerferad on 9/18/16, 2:45 AM