by nate_martin on 7/12/16, 5:19 PM with 106 comments
by matt_wulfeck on 7/12/16, 6:45 PM
by minimaxir on 7/12/16, 5:29 PM
I'm surprised Google itself has not said anything, as they are also at fault for not showing the permissions workflow in the first place.
by e12e on 7/12/16, 6:54 PM
On another note, from the "privacy policy":
1. REVISIONS TO THIS PRIVACY POLICY
Any information that is collected via our services is covered by the privacy policy in effect at the time such information is collected we may revise this privacy policy from time to time if we make any material changes to this privacy policy, including any change that we propose that will have retroactive effect, we’ll notify you of those changes by posting them on the services or by sending you an email or other notification, and we’ll update the “last updated date” above to indicate when those changes were made
So, they'll let you know if they apply retroactive changes to the policy? How is that any different from "lol, you give data, we do what we want, ok?"
by biogeneration on 7/12/16, 5:52 PM
by chromaton on 7/12/16, 7:43 PM
Accessing the camera and location I can understand, but I don't want to give Pokemon Go access to my contacts.
by panic on 7/13/16, 1:34 AM
by saturdaysaint on 7/12/16, 5:35 PM
by quaffapint on 7/12/16, 8:02 PM
by mattlutze on 7/13/16, 8:23 AM
There wasn't the normal "this app wants ___ permissions, is that cool?" message from the Google OAuth dialog. I had not idea I'd authorized Niantic to go scrape all my emails, access Google's own processing on them for advertisement system training or review my location history, for example.
I'm not so sure why I should believe they didn't do that.
by foota on 7/12/16, 9:10 PM
by mark_l_watson on 7/12/16, 5:41 PM
by stephenyeargin on 7/13/16, 4:16 AM
https://developers.google.com/identity/protocols/googlescope...
And most folks will click "Approve" without really reviewing the list. That said, Twitter and Facebook (two other popular OAuth providers) heavily restrict certain "full" access to only trusted applications that they either have a business relationship with or otherwise review the application before allowing those scopes to be requested or used. This incident may prompt Google to do more of that, which isn't entirely great news for the more responsible developers with purpose-built apps.
by qwertyuiop924 on 7/12/16, 8:08 PM
by callesgg on 7/12/16, 8:59 PM
...Wait a second do i think a company is great just cause they do things the way they should do them.
by rtanaka on 7/12/16, 7:46 PM
by unimpressive on 7/12/16, 6:07 PM
by sl1e on 7/12/16, 8:06 PM
by aftbit on 7/12/16, 5:54 PM
by cocotino on 7/12/16, 6:06 PM
Played Pokémon GO yesterday (iOS 1.0 version) and it was very buggy. Many bugs looked like they were server side (requests freezing), but there were strange rendering errors (like seeing only waves on the ground where Pokémon are, and not the actual Pokémon on them) that could be fixed by restarting the app several times. The phone also got absurdly hot, I never play on it, I don't know if it's normal for it to get like that, but I could barely hold it in my hand.
I literally couldn't understand all the fuss about the game, it was unplayable for me...