by I_HALF_CATS on 6/20/16, 5:01 PM with 22 comments
by linkregister on 6/20/16, 6:09 PM
It does bother me that VICE sometimes over-editorializes some of its stories and does some truth stretching. Overall, I think the quality stories are worthwhile and I can just roll my eyes at the misinformative ones, e.g. many on motherboard.vice.com.
I clicked on another entry in this ranty blog and found a hilarious VICE parody done by the Onion: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JHvrirXi5Ds .
by tn13 on 6/20/16, 6:20 PM
The whole zoo is like a fancy dress competition I dont see why VICE should be demonized or singled out.
P.S. Vice also remains probably the only media house to come up with these real off beat stories. They might have taken creative liberties with facts but then who does not ?
Examples:
https://broadly.vice.com/en_us/article/life-as-a-member-of-i... http://www.vice.com/read/first-person-shooter-building-maint... http://www.vice.com/read/why-prisons-should-give-inmates-acc...
by tcdent on 6/20/16, 5:53 PM
Regardless, a vast majority of their content doesn't include any reference to marketable brands. If the OP is accusing them of being a PR news agency, I have seen very little evidence of it. Questioning wether they are a business trying to earn a profit is incredibly naive.
However, if I was to criticize anything about their journalistic integrity, it's the tendency for their reporters to inject too much personal opinion. Though they do often succeed at concluding their pieces in a way that leaves the consumer considering multiple perspectives.
We don't have nearly enough (imperfect or not) media companies pursuing the types of stories Vice does. Given their willingness to publish exceptionable stories, it's no wonder there are significant attempts to discredit them.
by tn13 on 6/20/16, 6:20 PM
by serg_chernata on 6/20/16, 6:20 PM
by chrisdbaldwin on 6/20/16, 5:54 PM
by profeta on 6/20/16, 5:56 PM