by traviskuhl on 4/9/16, 6:28 PM with 56 comments
by cperciva on 4/10/16, 8:31 AM
1. Since the mapping from lines to gender goes through the actor/actress involved, it seems that "trouser roles" (particularly in animated features) may skew the statistics. I don't know if the effect is large enough to matter, though.
2. The analysis seems to be conducted on the basis of "lines" rather than "words". Does this skew the results? I wouldn't be surprised if predominantly-male "action" scenes had fewer words per line (or, put another way, more lines per word) than other scenes.
3. The analysis of actor/actress ages aggregates screenplays over all years of publication. This makes it impossible to distinguish between a bias towards young actresses and a bias towards actresses born after a particular date. This is a very important distinction in terms of policy response, since there is little gap between genders up to age 31: If the problem is "older actresses don't get many roles" then it needs a response, but if the problem was "actresses born before 1985 don't get many roles" then the problem will self-correct as the older generations are replaced by more egalitarian ones.
by facepalm on 4/10/16, 12:15 AM
I don't think an analysis like this is very useful at all. What matters is that all demographics get to see the films they like. It doesn't hurt one demographic if another demographic has more films made for.
Take women's magazines for example - while I haven't counted, it seems there seem to be an awful lot of them. Would it hurt men if there were more women's magazines than men's magazines? I'd argue it wouldn't hurt men at all.
So if you can show that there is a significant population that doesn't get to see the movies they want, I think you could get a better response.
by nhebb on 4/10/16, 10:08 AM
https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/4e15fa/the_largest_...
Also, from that thread, someone posted that USC does an annual film gender study. The latest is here [pdf]:
http://annenberg.usc.edu/sitecore/shell/Applications/Content...
by cm2187 on 4/10/16, 8:58 AM
For the same reason I would expect to see a disproportionate amount of policemen, soldiers and criminals.
They should do that by genre. I would be surprised if comedies, romance, or drama would be much imbalanced.
by facepalm on 4/10/16, 12:09 AM
by ps4fanboy on 4/9/16, 10:21 PM
Looking at their data, I took the "top 20" male and female movies and compared their world wide gross, male movies averaged 50% more than female.
by Animats on 4/10/16, 7:52 AM
by WalterBright on 4/10/16, 8:52 AM
by Syrup-tan on 4/9/16, 9:22 PM
by maxlambert on 4/9/16, 10:09 PM
If 20-30 year old women would write more great scripts the situation would be different.
I don't think that screenwriters owe us any social justice. All they need to do is to write the best story they can, and it's much easier to do if you can more easily relate to the main characters.