by primedteam on 2/5/16, 9:02 PM with 8 comments
by steven_pack on 2/5/16, 9:38 PM
I know what you mean about the team thing though. After 15 years in IT in London, Sydney, Copenhagen and San Francisco, there are definitely some teams I'd like to work together with again to build something great.
Busy with koalasafe.com just now, so not in for helping launch it.
by nedwin on 2/5/16, 9:27 PM
Check out what 3wks.com.au do on a small scale but I wonder if for multi-year projects you might want a team with more practical experience in the problem area - which is where acquihires generally come into swing.
by bigyahu on 2/7/16, 11:15 PM
And these teams rarely invested any time in training up their own reserve bench, so often a team would be suddenly crippled by one team member needing to take time out to e.g. start a family. The team would start falling apart as other members were forced to leave the team to find gigs solo.
by lewi on 2/7/16, 8:27 AM
I've always found that the teams I've built are more valuable than the sum of their parts. With all of these great people I've worked with it's getting to the point some are moving beyond the horizon. I'm looking at a means to maintain a close and diverse group of these colleagues who can be called upon to work together on assignments and/or grab resources from the figurative pool to create new projects.
Sounds good, but I feel the mechanics would be quite nuanced.
by fhub on 2/5/16, 9:43 PM
by patroqueeet on 2/8/16, 10:14 AM
the biggest challenge will be to make their outstanding advantages visible. As a dev team builder, I was always struggling to make my dev teams performance visible. especially to benchmark it against industry levels.
means: probably if you can solve, making IT performance of individuals/teams transparent and industry wide comparable (and hence connected to reasonable prices to charge), you might have solved your intention already.