by ericglyman on 1/13/16, 9:05 PM with 48 comments
by MichaelBurge on 1/13/16, 9:47 PM
This seems like the kind of company that would spoil this particular form of customer service. It just seems like greed more than any real value.
Now, those old scummy companies that used to offer rebates while employing actuaries to calculate percentage chance that you won't cash the rebate, intentionally make the process difficult, and then profit? Go ahead and run those guys into the ground. If someone could upload a scan of the rebate and have you guys do the rest, I wouldn't mind that.
by roymurdock on 1/13/16, 9:40 PM
I got my first rebate last night: 50 cents back on some RAM that had dropped in price the day after I purchased it. For anyone who is concerned about email permissions, here's the email (automatically sent from my personal account) to Amazon:
Subject: I was charged more than current price
Hey,
I am writing you to ask for a price adjustment review on a recently placed purchase. Please reference: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/xxxx and xxx.
I ordered a Crucial 16GB Kit (8GBx2) DDR3L-1600 SODIMM Memory for Mac (CT2K8G3S160BM ) for $66.99 on January 10.
However this afternoon I noticed that the price is $0.50 less than the amount I was charged, as it decreased to $66.49. As I bought the item recently, and the price has been significantly discounted, would it be possible for you to please start processing a post-order price adjustment refund?
Many thanks for your outstanding customer service.
Best, Roy Murdock
The service also attaches a screenshot of the shipping confirmation to the email automatically, which is pretty cool.
I suspect that I would get more value from the service if I purchased a higher volume of commodity/low price goods on Amazon, especially computing parts that are essentially guaranteed to go down in price within the near future. Overall, it's great to have this sort of protection from dropped prices and is definitely worth the email access permissions in my opinion - but at the first sign of a data breach or privacy issue, I will drop the service immediately. I am not affiliated with Paribus in any way.
by mmanfrin on 1/13/16, 9:43 PM
by cemregr on 1/13/16, 11:41 PM
by OopsCriticality on 1/13/16, 10:24 PM
A compare/contrast on the Paribus website would be helpful.
I see statements that Paribus doesn't sell customer data, but on the Paribus blog, I see analytics run against what appears to be customer data. That dichotomy concerns me.
Are there any limits on how often a customer can request a rebate? What happens if the customer hits that limit? Will a company "fire" a customer, as can happen to people who return items too frequently?
I'm also surprised to see that Citibank has a patent in this area…
by gervase on 1/13/16, 10:00 PM
If you change your purchasing habits to choose items only sold by Amazon, you could quickly exceed any possible savings by paying the higher direct price than you'd pay for the same product (with the same shipping time) that you'd get from a third-party merchant.
Just an FYI if you're thinking about signing up for the service.
by bitwarrior on 1/14/16, 1:17 AM
by jonaldomo on 1/13/16, 10:11 PM
by TheBiv on 1/13/16, 9:26 PM
I don't know if I want to authenticate my email address with them though.
It seems to me like Amazon/Best Buy/etc next move will be to add a provision that "You must submit a claim not through an automated service"
by rangersanger on 1/13/16, 10:34 PM
Another possibility- Amazon just coopts the idea and rolls it into a feature of prime, ala Orbitz.
by ars on 1/14/16, 7:13 AM
It's pretty easy to add a rule in most email providers that forward only message matching certain patterns - you could even provide documentation of what patterns to include.
by ddavidn on 1/13/16, 10:42 PM
by Nemant on 1/14/16, 5:27 AM
by sirtastic on 1/13/16, 9:33 PM
by pragmatic on 1/14/16, 12:46 AM
It appears that savings catcher is only for current prices, not prices that drop later.
by moonka on 1/13/16, 10:28 PM
by stephenitis on 1/14/16, 2:24 AM
by eachro on 1/13/16, 9:53 PM
by crocowhile on 1/14/16, 10:33 AM