by rvikmanis on 10/10/15, 5:08 AM with 130 comments
by codeshaman on 10/10/15, 9:38 AM
"If God were to permit you a brief voyage into the divine process, let you whirl for a second into the atomic nucleus or spin you out on a light-year trip through the galaxies, how on earth would you describe what you saw when you got back, breathless, to your office? This metaphor may sound farfetched or irrelevant, but just ask someone who has taken a heavy dose of LSD." - Tim Leary, The politics of ecstasy, 1968
It's similar to the 'overview effect' reported by astronauts who've been to space. Of course it triggers a paradigm shift and 'cures' depression or other mind-loops that we find ourselves in so often.
It's good to see that there are more discussions about psychedelics in the scientific community. I suspect there are many (more and more) scientists and academics who use psychedelics so I think we will see more and more material published on this subject, apart from the huge amount of anecdotal material available online.
I also suspect that people use more psychedelics now than ever in our history. And it's happening globally. And it's a good thing.
Because I believe psychedelics are the mythical 'love bomb' which can stop wars and bring peace to people and other species on Earth. And they could, in theory, cure cancer - certainly the psychological and spiritual effects of the disease, which could bring remission to it's physical manifestation.
So yeah, there's lots of research still to be done.
by chestervonwinch on 10/10/15, 3:44 PM
by fsiefken on 10/10/15, 10:45 AM
by Litost on 10/10/15, 11:24 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y0c5nIvJH7w
Out of interest, are there any other theories as to what might have caused this "leap"?
by s_dev on 10/10/15, 9:42 AM
I don't see how if it was clinically manufactured and administered the risks couldn't be acceptably mitigated. The interviewee seems confident the government is on board and things are going down a new path though so I guess this could be a thing now.
by xacaxulu on 10/10/15, 6:34 PM
by api on 10/10/15, 6:09 PM
by Mz on 10/10/15, 8:11 PM
It sounds to me like it may imply that much of what we call "mental health" disorders are really somatopsychic conditions.
by Synaesthesia on 10/10/15, 8:38 AM
by werber on 10/10/15, 12:22 PM
by noahdesu on 10/10/15, 4:46 PM
by thucydides on 10/10/15, 8:03 PM
Strategic concerns aside, psychedelics clearly are powerful medicines and can yield profound insights, and their relative safety makes their Schedule 1 status morally repellent.
by Glench on 10/10/15, 5:10 PM
by ArkyBeagle on 10/10/15, 9:21 PM
It least puts such ideas in a position of having to work a lot harder to make their case.
by max-a on 10/10/15, 8:54 AM
by nmrm2 on 10/10/15, 9:38 AM
I have no doubt that psychedelics are capable of producing lasting changes in behaviors, habits, or outlooks. Actually, I'd be surprised if that particular point is at all controversial.
However, prespcribing a psychedlic that could have lasting impacts on a person for "reasons we don't understand" seems... unnecessarily dangerous, whenever an alternative exists. Which of course is only an argument for more research.