by davegri on 10/7/15, 6:09 PM with 38 comments
by anigbrowl on 10/7/15, 8:09 PM
If you look at a real stock photo site you see the professionals put in a ton of extra work, eg they'll have maybe 20 photos built around the same model/theme so that if one's not quite right another is, or to give a feeling of depth above and beyond individual pretty photos.
Personally I would not use this service. Stock photography is already cheap and it's already hard enough for photographers to make a living without competition from free, even if it's not free-as-in-beer. I would much rather buy the rights or do the work myself than spend all my time wandering around the Libre Landfill. A term like that might sound cruel or dismissive, but I don't care for the way that the cult of the amateur and the availability of very cheap technology has massively devalued the craft of professional photographers. This is part of a much longer historical trend in which the artistic/creative input to a piece of work is systematically undervalued and more is invested in marketing it than producing it. Selling is important, but the problem is that salespeople generally don't care what they sell as long as they get paid for doing so.
by omm on 10/7/15, 8:11 PM
by yaps8 on 10/7/15, 7:16 PM
"0 Results for silly face"
by 15charlimit on 10/7/15, 7:44 PM
It also returns actual bees, but why the beer? Is it not an exact match search?
by supersan on 10/7/15, 9:36 PM
by pmiller2 on 10/7/15, 7:46 PM
Edit: I get the intended scrolling mechanism when I page down in Firefox, but not in Chrome.
by bariumbitmap on 10/7/15, 9:40 PM
by zecho on 10/7/15, 7:56 PM
by Retr0spectrum on 10/7/15, 7:56 PM
by oberstein on 10/7/15, 9:41 PM
by hamhamed on 10/7/15, 7:42 PM
by skrowl on 10/7/15, 7:47 PM
by yarrel on 10/7/15, 6:23 PM